点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
彰显礼仪之邦大国气质 舞剧《五星出东方》“走红”元宵晚会******
中新网北京2月16日电 (徐婧)温暖喜庆的上元灯火铺满天空，秀美灵动的舞者一同仰望祈愿……元宵节期间，以国家一级文物“五星出东方利中国”汉代织锦护臂为题材创作的舞剧《五星出东方》登陆哔哩哔哩、河南卫视等多台元宵晚会，“锦绣”舞段火爆出圈，引发全网热议。
“锦绣”舞段是怎样创作出来的？舞剧这一艺术形式有何特点？重现汉朝风貌时，团队发挥了哪些奇思妙想？
繁华“锦绣”描绘共荣图景
记者从北京演艺集团获悉，《五星出东方》“锦绣”舞段的创作构思来源于“中国是礼仪之邦”的解读，肢体动作、形象气质、队形调度等都是围绕着展现大国气质来完成编排，舞者们垂眸而出、步伐轻缓蹁跹，传递出内敛而含蓄，具有独特古典韵味的美感，同时又以四肢和头部舞蹈动作，形成顿挫感和力量感，给观众以浓厚宫廷色彩下的庄重威仪，气场全开的感受。
舞剧《五星出东方》总编导王舸介绍，“锦绣”舞蹈属于汉唐舞的舞种，在创作中首先深度研究汉代时期的动作形象特征，进而追求整体气质的吻合，再通过对细节的处理，参考了古时建筑中的榫卯，在舞段中加入了井字格旋转调度，传递出舞蹈“稳定感”的气质，最后通过服化道整合呈现，再现大汉盛世歌舞宴乐的繁华景象。
舞剧中，当上元灯火铺满天空，“锦绣”舞者们齐齐仰望祈愿，充满了欢乐与期许，也传递出各民族和谐友爱、同生共荣的主题。
图为舞剧《五星出东方》剧照。 北京演艺集团供图汉韵红装重现盛世欢颜
“锦绣”舞段的服装和舞者妆容创作参考来源是主创们采风时在博物馆里见到的汉代木俑人像。木俑人像衣着纤细的汉服曲裾裙，款式包裹而限制，这是因为在古时宫廷里有很多礼仪制度，不能跑跳。
因此，舞剧《五星出东方》在服饰创作时充分尊重历史史实，把古时礼仪制度进行解读还原，形成了“锦绣”服装的独到特色。
在服装上，使用大面积红搭配白色做挑色，展现大汉风韵，款式与体现身体曲线的西方美学不同，采用宽袍大袖，刻意拉低服装腰线，以达到一种宽阔的东方美感。
在人物造型和化妆上，以汉时期审美为出发点，头饰设计为汉白玉质感纹样的造型，庄重而典雅，面部是极具汉时期代表性的妆容“长眉红妆”：这个妆容的特点就是大面积运用朱红色铺满眼下及脸颊，喜庆隆重又提气色，非常有氛围感。“锦绣”舞段以深度还原时期的文化审美，展开了一幅多姿多色的民族画卷，秀美汉韵红装，重现盛世欢颜。
图为舞剧《五星出东方》剧照。 北京演艺集团供图古典乐器演绎大国气质
“锦绣”这段舞蹈音乐优美而空灵，同时又带有压倒式的气魄感，有观众直言“鸡皮疙瘩起来了”。据介绍，音乐创作中，呈现这段舞蹈的核心语汇是“仪态”。舞段开始是从织布机发出“嘎吱嘎吱”的声音展开，之后古琴悠扬的声音响起，其余乐器慢慢融入，整体逐渐进入到一个恢弘磅礴的状态中。
据了解，这段舞的乐器中用到了古琴、箜篌、琵琶、萧等中国古典乐器，在作曲中都是单独呈现，也给舞蹈展示留下了更多空间并与音乐产生联动，给观众带来感官上的共情，悠扬乐声中联想到大汉风姿的仪态万千。
“锦绣”之美，美在展现大国气质，美在考究精致的细节，美在民族古典的乐声悠扬。据了解，除了展现大汉气魄的“锦绣”舞，舞剧《五星出东方》中还有曾登陆过《国家宝藏·展演季》和河南卫视《舞千年》等节目、充满西域风情的婀娜“灯舞”等，风格截然不同的舞段在同一部舞剧中集中展示，带来不同的观剧体验。
舞剧《五星出东方》由中共北京市委宣传部、中共新疆维吾尔自治区党委宣传部出品，北京演艺集团联合北京市援疆和田指挥部、和田地委宣传部共同制作，北京歌剧舞剧院、新疆新玉歌舞团演出。目前，该剧的50场全国巡演正在进行，后续将在济南、佛山、泉州、深圳等地进行演出。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)